{ 2 trackbacks }

Twitted by SMEAdvantage
July 11, 2010 at 9:00 pm
Twitted by Rainbow_Chasers
July 12, 2010 at 1:51 pm

{ 11 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Anthony Calzadilla July 11, 2010 at 6:19 pm

I like it! The original logo didn't have the crease on the back. Although the crack is subtler on the new logo, the crease on the back draws the eye right to it :)

2 Greg O. July 11, 2010 at 6:20 pm

Wished they'd white-outed that ugly, dangling "+" with the re-design.

3 ErnieChiara July 11, 2010 at 11:11 pm

Like the redesign. Though, to be fair, they did remove the crack. Cheeks are still there (and good for them!), but the crack is totally gone. Buttcheecks ≠ Crack.

4 Ben Saufley July 13, 2010 at 11:46 am

Am I the only one who thinks the whole point of the woman on the old logo was to point out how instead of resting on a flat surface, people who sleep on Tempur-Pedic beds have straight spines and the bed will give to match their contours? So the text was slightly deformed, and encroached upon on the top? And now that's gone? I think the spine line is a decent addition as far as pointing out that benefit, but the woman doesn't seem to make much sense as a logo element anymore, without that bottom curve.

And I'm with Ernie. A blog post about how they kept the crack seems a little strange when they have essentially removed it altogether.

5 commenter July 25, 2010 at 8:42 pm

Yeah, I have to agree- I don't understand the praise when the butt is essentially gone. Sure, the outer-shape is there, but so is the case in any depiction of the reserve side of a person.

The crack is what tells you it's a naked butt! This new logo is more like a sheer and/or tight garment. Most places in the world aren't so squeamish and puritanical about the matter. European TV shows will show the occasional breast or bottom and no one thinks of it as prurient.

I actually feel disappointed that the company didn't stand their ground. Also, the figure of the new logo looks somewhat less curvy. The hip/waist ratio is less pronounced.

6 Krug July 25, 2010 at 9:30 pm

I think the crack is still present! Look at the sharp arrowpoint. That spells "crack" to this commenter. --Krug

7 Krug July 25, 2010 at 9:31 pm

("A subtle butt crack is still a butt crack." Agreed.) --Krug

8 Elie July 26, 2010 at 3:17 pm

Do butt cracks sell mattresses? What I like in the new design is that they cleaned up the lines but they cleaned it a bit too much because now the body not touching the letters. What does the logo say other than its a mattress company? Before its purpose is to illustrate that the unique foam mattress contours to the shape of the body to keep the spine aligned. They should have pursued this more in the new design by having the imprint of the body in to illustrate the memory of the foam. Done right it won't be too busy at all. The focus should be on the memory foam not a butt crack.

9 Lindsey July 28, 2010 at 11:38 pm

how have I not noticed this before?? well done

10 Julie August 17, 2010 at 10:32 am

The way the old body squished the mattress was inconsistent. Only the E was foam-like. The P was more like a spring. Better to do away with it than do it badly. At least they fixed that really weird foot thing.

11 Mindy March 8, 2011 at 12:10 pm

Right on, Elie! I agree that they should have kept the body touching the words to make shape of the mattress on the new logo. That's exactly what the company is all about...

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: