<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ICON Reax, Part 1: Is Animation the Future of Illustration?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://imprint.printmag.com/animation/icon-reax-is-animation-the-future-of-illustration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://imprint.printmag.com/animation/icon-reax-is-animation-the-future-of-illustration/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=icon-reax-is-animation-the-future-of-illustration</link>
	<description>Expanding the Design Conversation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:47:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imprint-The Online Community for Graphic Designers &#124; My Ten Best (and One Worst) Design Items of the Half-Year</title>
		<link>http://imprint.printmag.com/animation/icon-reax-is-animation-the-future-of-illustration/comment-page-1/#comment-85801</link>
		<dc:creator>Imprint-The Online Community for Graphic Designers &#124; My Ten Best (and One Worst) Design Items of the Half-Year</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 21:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imprint.printmag.com/?p=40741#comment-85801</guid>
		<description>[...] best response during the last half of this year to ICON conference concerns that the future of magazine publishing is in peril: Elephant, the best design related magazine that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] best response during the last half of this year to ICON conference concerns that the future of magazine publishing is in peril: Elephant, the best design related magazine that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imprint-The Online Community for Graphic Designers &#124; Monte Beauchamp Blabs About His Fine Art-Comics-Graphics-Illustration World</title>
		<link>http://imprint.printmag.com/animation/icon-reax-is-animation-the-future-of-illustration/comment-page-1/#comment-26571</link>
		<dc:creator>Imprint-The Online Community for Graphic Designers &#124; Monte Beauchamp Blabs About His Fine Art-Comics-Graphics-Illustration World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imprint.printmag.com/?p=40741#comment-26571</guid>
		<description>[...] A firestorm of anger and debate raged at the recent ICON illustrators&#8217; conference when &#8220;animation&#8221; was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A firestorm of anger and debate raged at the recent ICON illustrators&#8217; conference when &#8220;animation&#8221; was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Illustration Has to Move &#171; Casual Notes</title>
		<link>http://imprint.printmag.com/animation/icon-reax-is-animation-the-future-of-illustration/comment-page-1/#comment-10571</link>
		<dc:creator>Illustration Has to Move &#171; Casual Notes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 21:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imprint.printmag.com/?p=40741#comment-10571</guid>
		<description>[...] From the ICON conference here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From the ICON conference here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imprint-The Online Community for Graphic Designers &#124; Roger Black Discusses Future Potential for Type Design</title>
		<link>http://imprint.printmag.com/animation/icon-reax-is-animation-the-future-of-illustration/comment-page-1/#comment-9331</link>
		<dc:creator>Imprint-The Online Community for Graphic Designers &#124; Roger Black Discusses Future Potential for Type Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imprint.printmag.com/?p=40741#comment-9331</guid>
		<description>[...] a great deal of anger and dispute. I gathered some of that feedback for Imprint, which you can read here and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a great deal of anger and dispute. I gathered some of that feedback for Imprint, which you can read here and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Animation the future of Illustration? &#171; The Department of Illustration</title>
		<link>http://imprint.printmag.com/animation/icon-reax-is-animation-the-future-of-illustration/comment-page-1/#comment-9231</link>
		<dc:creator>Animation the future of Illustration? &#171; The Department of Illustration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imprint.printmag.com/?p=40741#comment-9231</guid>
		<description>[...] animation the future of illustration&#8217; Micahel Dooley at imprint collected comments  from the recent ICON6 illustrated conference such as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] animation the future of illustration&#8217; Micahel Dooley at imprint collected comments  from the recent ICON6 illustrated conference such as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ICON6 Illustration Conference Wrap Up &#124; TechnicalIllustrators.org</title>
		<link>http://imprint.printmag.com/animation/icon-reax-is-animation-the-future-of-illustration/comment-page-1/#comment-6211</link>
		<dc:creator>ICON6 Illustration Conference Wrap Up &#124; TechnicalIllustrators.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 16:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imprint.printmag.com/?p=40741#comment-6211</guid>
		<description>[...] This was cause for much trepidation. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This was cause for much trepidation. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Robinson</title>
		<link>http://imprint.printmag.com/animation/icon-reax-is-animation-the-future-of-illustration/comment-page-1/#comment-3381</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imprint.printmag.com/?p=40741#comment-3381</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been working as an illustrator and animator for 18 years. The two disciplines have evolved together and informed each other, but like mastering any craft, it takes time and experience. I&#039;m still a long way from being a master of either, but I do know animation requires learning a lot more than a new piece of software. It requires a different kind of mindset and sensitivity, as well as certain craft techniques, to impart the illusion of movement and life to a static image.  My worry is, that because animation software is readily available, illustrators are expected to read a manual and suddenly become animators. Knowing how to use Flash no more makes you an animator, than knowing how to use Word makes you a novelist. Animation software just moves stuff around the screen. That&#039;s not the same as animating it. The web is already awash with badly animated illustration, which demeans both art forms. The question that commissioners should ask, is not CAN we animate this, but SHOULD we animate this. The strength of illustration is it&#039;s ability to convey meaning, or multiple meanings in a single powerful image. If a certain message can be conveyed more successfully with a moving image, fine - but please don&#039;t assume the illustrator will be the best person to animate their artwork.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've been working as an illustrator and animator for 18 years. The two disciplines have evolved together and informed each other, but like mastering any craft, it takes time and experience. I'm still a long way from being a master of either, but I do know animation requires learning a lot more than a new piece of software. It requires a different kind of mindset and sensitivity, as well as certain craft techniques, to impart the illusion of movement and life to a static image.  My worry is, that because animation software is readily available, illustrators are expected to read a manual and suddenly become animators. Knowing how to use Flash no more makes you an animator, than knowing how to use Word makes you a novelist. Animation software just moves stuff around the screen. That's not the same as animating it. The web is already awash with badly animated illustration, which demeans both art forms. The question that commissioners should ask, is not CAN we animate this, but SHOULD we animate this. The strength of illustration is it's ability to convey meaning, or multiple meanings in a single powerful image. If a certain message can be conveyed more successfully with a moving image, fine - but please don't assume the illustrator will be the best person to animate their artwork.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Animation Kills Illustration, and&#8230; Call for Submissions: YouTube Play: Biennial of Creative Video &#171; Drawn! The Illustration and Cartooning Blog</title>
		<link>http://imprint.printmag.com/animation/icon-reax-is-animation-the-future-of-illustration/comment-page-1/#comment-2931</link>
		<dc:creator>Animation Kills Illustration, and&#8230; Call for Submissions: YouTube Play: Biennial of Creative Video &#171; Drawn! The Illustration and Cartooning Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imprint.printmag.com/?p=40741#comment-2931</guid>
		<description>[...] iPad delivery. Graphic media writer Michael Dooley in Print Magazine&#8217;s online presence has assembled comments from ICON attendees about it. By the way, the RSS feed on Imprint&#8217;s column for illustration [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] iPad delivery. Graphic media writer Michael Dooley in Print Magazine&#8217;s online presence has assembled comments from ICON attendees about it. By the way, the RSS feed on Imprint&#8217;s column for illustration [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank M Hansen</title>
		<link>http://imprint.printmag.com/animation/icon-reax-is-animation-the-future-of-illustration/comment-page-1/#comment-2091</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank M Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 22:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imprint.printmag.com/?p=40741#comment-2091</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately I do think clients (the market) will JUMP on the motion wagon at first in the same way the motion picture industry has jumped on 3D.  But after some time has passed the novelty will wear off and motion illustrations will be regulated to the places where it makes sense and can add something that perhaps a still image can not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately I do think clients (the market) will JUMP on the motion wagon at first in the same way the motion picture industry has jumped on 3D.  But after some time has passed the novelty will wear off and motion illustrations will be regulated to the places where it makes sense and can add something that perhaps a still image can not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ICON 6 &#8211; day one</title>
		<link>http://imprint.printmag.com/animation/icon-reax-is-animation-the-future-of-illustration/comment-page-1/#comment-2081</link>
		<dc:creator>ICON 6 &#8211; day one</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 22:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://imprint.printmag.com/?p=40741#comment-2081</guid>
		<description>[...] http://imprint.printmag.com/animation/icon-reax-is-animation-the-future-of-illustration/   Share and Enjoy: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://imprint.printmag.com/animation/icon-reax-is-animation-the-future-of-illustration/" rel="nofollow">http://imprint.printmag.com/animation/icon-reax-is-animation-the-future-of-illustration/</a>   Share and Enjoy: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

